• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Universities of Wisconsin Office of Online and Professional Learning Resources

Main Navigation

  • Home
  • Who We Are
  • Campus Partnerships Open Sub Menu
    • Online Program Development
      • Integrated Marketing
      • Recruitment
      • Retention and Student Services
      • Instructional Design
      • Learning Technology and Media Services
    • Continuing Education Executive Council
  • For Students Open Sub Menu
    • Independent Learning
    • UW Online Collaborative Degree Programs
    • UW Flexible Option
  • Contact Us

Return to Main Navigation Top.

Archives for News

News

News

It’s All in the HIPS

By Kristin Kowal
December 2, 2019

December 2, 2019

Earlier this year, we surveyed instructors on what topics they would like to learn more about. High-Impact Practices (HIPs) received the most votes. This blog post has some general information on HIPs, a link to our webinar on HIPs, and an example of how you can use HIPs to make a small but important change in your course.

What are HIPs?

High-Impact Practices are argued to be beneficial to students when implemented cohesively1. This list of practices has been around since 2008, with the more recent addition of ePortfolios in 2016. These practices are:

  1. First-Year Seminars and Experiences
  2. Common Intellectual Experiences
  3. Learning Communities
  4. Writing-Intensive Courses
  5. Collaborative Assignments and Projects
  6. Undergraduate Research
  7. Diversity/Global Learning
  8. ePortfolios
  9. Service Learning, Community-Based Learning
  10. Internships
  11. Capstone Courses and Projects

The bolded practices are the ones that are most prevalent in our online programs at UW Extended Campus. If you’d like to read more about these High-Impact Practices, you can find a list of High-Impact Practices and descriptions of each in this PDF to learn more!

Webinar

Two of our Senior Instructional Designers, Eileen Horn and Kristine Pierick, presented the webinar High-Impact Practices for Online Courses in November. They discuss what HIPs are and why people should care about them. They also cover how HIPs are used in our courses and some implementation tips. If this sounds interesting, you can watch the recording here!

Using HIPs to Make Small Changes

Something the webinar doesn’t cover is the Eight Key Elements that HIPs share2. If you look at the list below, chances are you could find many of these elements in assignments and strategies that you already use in your course!

Eight Key Elements

  1. Performance levels set at appropriately high expectations
  2. Significant investment of time and effort by students over an extended period of time
  3. Interactions with faculty and peers about substantive matters
  4. Experiences with diversity, wherein students are exposed to and must contend with people and circumstances that differ from those with which students are familiar
  5. Frequent, timely, and constructive feedback
  6. Periodic, structured opportunities to reflect and integrate learning
  7. Opportunities to discover relevance of learning through real-world applications
  8. Public demonstration of competence

I share these elements because they can be useful tools for you to use if you are making changes in your course or need some inspiration. For example, you could create a more impactful discussion by asking students to discuss their viewpoints with someone that has a different background from themselves (see Key Element #4) instead of a traditional discussion question.

Is there an assignment you could modify to include one of these eight elements? If so, do you think that would be beneficial to your students? Why or why not?

As an example, let’s take a look at how we could use HIPs to make a small change to a course under revision!

The Case of the Disconnected Discussion

Let’s pretend that Rosie, our student, is taking a course where she has to build a brick wall. She is hard at work on this project throughout this semester. This brick wall can be a stand-in for any project you can imagine (e.g., building a computer program, writing a business proposal, creating a marketing plan, etc). Any of these possible projects share most of the eight key elements of HIPs.

 

Rosie the student is building a brick wall.
Rosie is working on her project.

 

In addition to her course project, Rosie is required to participate in a discussion every week.

Rosie's classmate Boaz tries to start a discussion.
Rosie’s classmate Boaz begins talking to her about the theory of bricklaying. Rosie needs to respond but feels like time is being taken from her project.

In the image, Boaz is placed off to the side in this image to represent that the discussion isn’t directly connected to what we already know motivates the students: the project. While discussions on bricklaying (or another relevant course concept) are valuable, Rosie still might view this discussion as busywork. Rosie’s instructor realizes that this might be a problem and wants to change the discussions to make them more applicable and impactful for the students.

What Would You Do?

Think about how you would change the discussions if you were the instructor of this course. Look at the list of HIPs and the Eight Key Elements for inspiration. Alternatively, you could come up with your idea first and see if it matches any of the HIPs or Eight Key Elements.

A Possible Revision!

Rosie’s instructor decides to place students into small discussion groups to work together find and fix errors in an example of the project. These errors are common mistakes that students make in the project every semester, so the instructor knows there will be an active discussion.

  • The students collaborate (Key Element #3; HIP #5) on the discussion board.
  • This happens well before every project checkpoint (Key Element #5 and #6).
Rosie and Boaz identify problems with a brick will.
Boaz and Rosie find problems with this brick wall and propose how to fix them and how they can avoid making the same errors going forward.

At the end of the semester, the students are happy because they see how what they are learning affects their project, and the instructor is happy because the students are learning and applying important concepts.

If you have any components of your course that feel a bit disconnected, you can use the HIPs and Eight Key Elements resources as a guide to change things for the better. You could also look at this example as strengthening something that is already working well (in this case, adding collaborative practice to a course that has no group work).

Do you have any questions about HIPs or experiences you would like to share? Comment them below!

1High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter, by George D. Kuh (AAC&U, 2008).

2Ensuring Quality & Taking High-Impact Practices to Scale by George D. Kuh and Ken O’Donnell, with Case Studies by Sally Reed. (Washington, DC: AAC&U, 2013).

Faculty Symposium: Feedback, Discussions, Revisions, and Introduction Videos, Oh My!

By Kristin Kowal
August 13, 2019

August 13, 2019

UW Extended Campus held its third annual faculty symposium this year in Madison, Wisconsin, on June 3 and 4. The instructional design and multimedia teams had a blast presenting our breakout sessions. While we can’t re-create the warm, fuzzy feeling of mingling and sharing ideas with our faculty in a blog post, we can at least share our presentation materials.

Connections and Reflections: Feedback in Canvas

Session Overview

A group activity during the Connections and Reflections breakout

Instructional Designers Stephen Beers and Eric Peloza chose this topic because it was focused on tools in Canvas, and it was timely and relevant because many of our faculty are just getting started in Canvas; Stephen and Eric also chose the topic because they wanted to highlight how important and influential faculty are in the student experience.

It was great to hear faculty share their feedback and knowledge of Canvas and its tools. For example, one faculty member mentioned how they used the mute feature, which many faculty found beneficial. Overall it was a lot of fun, and I enjoyed the unique questions and topics that came out of each session. —Eric Peloza, Instructional Designer

 

Main Takeaways

I asked Eric Peloza about his main takeaways of the presentation. He highlighted four:

  1. Yes, feedback does matter. Our teams hear about the wonderful job our faculty do with feedback and how much students value feedback.
  2. The frequency and timing of feedback matters. This is a challenge for faculty and the good news is that Canvas has tools that faculty can leverage. Course level reports (course analytics) and announcements are great ways to reach or review the class as a whole. Templated feedback is another great way to help faculty. Using rubrics or automatic feedback in Canvas is a great way to improve the immediacy of feedback.
  3. Feedback is improved when it is specific. Canvas gives faculty options across all of assignment types in Canvas. This includes general feedback by way of text, video, or file upload, along with using specialized tools such as DocViewer in Canvas.
  4. Sometimes, questions work better than statements. This is best best leveraged in discussions. Interrogative questions can open up or keep discussion going among students. Again, Canvas can be leveraged here in facilitating feedback. Another great feature is that faculty can view all of a student’s submissions at once.

Download the Presentation Materials

You can download the Connections and Reflections: Feedback in Canvas Presentation here.

Part Deux: Discussion on the Rocks? Add a Twist of Fresh Alternatives!

Faculty connecting over how they use discussions in their courses in this group activity

Session Overview

My fellow instructional designer Laurie Berry and I presented on ways to add a little “zest” to online discussions by varying the discussion format. We reviewed the two most popular strategies that we presented at the symposium last year (you can get a full explanation of these strategies in my blog post “Five New Twists for Online Discussions”). Then, we presented three new “twists” faculty used in their course during the spring semester. There may have been some light dancing as well.

[The faculty] seemed interested in trying at least one, if not more, of the presented twist ideas. They also liked the format/layout of the presentation where it showed the traditional question and seeing how the twist can transform the question into something new without too much effort. I think they also liked seeing their colleagues’ testimonials of student engagement as well as tips and tricks for success. —Laurie Berry, Instructional Designer

Main Takeaways

Laurie summarized the key points of the presentation:

Providing the same type of discussion throughout the course multiple times can become repetitive and boring to students and faculty. Adding a twist to at least one discussion provides unique ways to get students to interact with course content and to engage with each other. Also, don’t be afraid to try something new or different with a discussion board activity.

Download the Presentation Materials

You can download the Part Deux: Discussion on the Rocks? Add a Twist of Fresh Alternatives Presentation here.

Extreme Course Makeovers

Ryan Martinez and Kristin Pierick lead a group activity in their Extreme Makeovers session.

Instructional designers Ryan Martinez and Kristine Pierick presented on a topic that nearly all instructors will encounter: how to prioritize course revision tasks. Ryan and Kristine used the metaphor of renovating a house and examples of how to pick specific projects to fit your time and budget to bring this presentation to life.

We had several faculty members express their own difficulties when revising their courses. We also shared several examples from faculty that were in the audience, so they were also able to elaborate more on our points, which was very helpful. All in all, it was also a good session because faculty were very willing to walk through some of their troubles and to also help some of the faculty who have not done a revision yet navigate some of their potential issues. —Ryan Martinez, Instructional Designer

Main Takeaways

Ryan summarized the main takeaways:

The main takeaways from our presentation are for faculty to be considerate of their time and resources when they are ready to revise a course, and reconcile what they can actually do in the time frame versus what they would like to do.

Download the Presentation Materials

You can download the Extreme Course Makeovers Presentation here.

Meet the Instructor: Building a Social Connection

Nick Meyer explains why “Meet the Instructor” videos are important.

Nick Meyer and Bryan Bortz from the media services team presented on how “Meet the Instructor” videos can build a social presence in your course. They demystified the process of working with media services to create a “Meet the Instructor” video. This session was recommended for faculty who are new to online learning and/or developing a course in the next one to two years.

Main Takeaways

The main objectives of the presentation were that faculty will:

  • Gain an understanding of the purpose and importance of “Meet the Instructor” Videos.
  • Acquire knowledge of the planning process.
  • Obtain tips and tricks for generating ideas for “Meet the Instructor” videos.
  • Gain an understanding of the filming process.

Download the Presentation Materials

You can download the Meet the Instructor: Building a Social Connection Presentation here.

You can view Nick and Bryan’s highlight reel of introduction videos here.

For even more examples of what the media services team can do, view their Faculty Showcase here.

Future Topics

Do you have an idea for a future topic that you want to see us present (or to present yourself)? Comment on this post or email me at kristin.kowal@uwex.edu!

Learner-Generated Instruction and CBE Micro-Credentials

By Justin Mason
December 18, 2017

December 18, 2017

Comic. Three men under the banner “A public service message from the Society for the Preservation of Normal Looking Higher Education.” The man on right says, “Friends, please consider these two questions. 1) Are learners capable of creating quality instructional content? 2) Would a university ever validate learner-generated content by associating it with a credential?”

“In other words, if a student passes a course that contains learner-made content in its curriculum, should the student learn a university backed credential? The answer, of course, if NO!!! I mean, in what topsy-turvy universe does learner equal teacher? This spells one thing: TROUBLE!!” The man in the middle says, “It also spells mutiny.” The man on the left says, “Students aren’t qualified to teach. Their work contains inaccuracies and lacks substance. This has all been documented before. Now someone in the competency-based micro-credentialing world wants to rehash the idea of learner-generated, or worse, wiki-generated, instructional content and pretend it’s something new.” The man in the middle says, “Please, we thought of that and didn’t do it years ago!”
The man on the left says, “Frankly, it’s naïve to think that instructional content made on a wiki, whether by learners or interested professionals, could lead to any of the following… Curriculum that is up to date, transparent, and validated, a student experience improved by user testing, a way for industry to directly voice its needs, lower development costs (leading to more affordable credentials), or empowered learners.” The man in the middle says, “This is open-source constructivist nonsense at its worst—some real ds106-level malfeasance!” The man on the right sighs and says, “No one understands you when you talk like that.”

Call to Action

At the University of Wisconsin–Extension CEOEL, we are trying something new: a pilot course that uses learner and user-generated instructional content. The experimental pilot will be offered through our competency-based micro-credentialing platform the University Learning Store. You, along with students and other interested professionals, can help us build the course!

The subject of the course is Human Resource Management: Creating a Training Plan. An unfinished draft of the course is available for editing now on Wikiversity (a sibling of Wikipedia). We sincerely hope you will take a look and contribute.

https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Create_a_training_and_development_plan

Why Are We Doing This?

There are several reasons we believe learner- and user-generated content is worth investigating in the context of micro-credentialing. First and foremost, we want to offer learners affordable credentials that employers value. Instructional content that is user-generated yet also validated by experts might be a way to offer learners high-quality university-backed credentials at a price they can afford.

A second reason has to do with giving industries and employers a voice in the education of potential future employees.

Third, wouldn’t it be great if there was a sustainable way for higher education to create OERs (open educational resources)?  Learner- and user-generated wiki content could do that!

What Is the University Learning Store?

A first in nonprofit higher education, the University Learning Store offers a practical and affordable way for learners to earn credentials that hold real value in today’s job market.

The University Learning Store is a partnership among a prestigious group of universities to create a new kind of credential. ULS credentials…

  • Are competency-based and verified by employers
  • Use authentic assessments to prove learner proficiency
  • Can be completed in just days or weeks
  • Contain competency summaries that tell employers exactly what you know and can do

 

* For instance:
Keen, A. (2007). The Cult of the Amateur: How today’s Internet is killing our culture and assaulting our economy. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing.

Developing and Working in Project-based CBE

By Eileen Horn
November 20, 2017

November 20, 2017

We are now deep into Fall as leaves and temperatures continue to drop. The excitement of back-to-school season has now given way to mid-terms and the routines of mid-semester academic work for students and faculty. But what if you’re working in a self-paced, competency-based education (CBE) program? There’s nothing routine about CBE, whether you’re a student or faculty member. Competency-based education is a big change for everyone, from administrators to students. As we approach the one-year mark since launching the Flexible Option business administration degree, I wanted to check in with the academic director and faculty developer, Suresh Chalasani, to talk about the Flex faculty perspective. I asked Suresh to reflect on his experience, focusing on a few questions about how he approached the CBE change as a faculty member.

What was your approach to designing projects for the business administration degree?Flex Business IS305 Database Design and Development Description that says "This project gives you the opportunity, via a realistic business scenario, to develop and demonstrate your ability to build information systems that can be used for decision making. You will use database software to build database tables, create queries, and define reports for the ultimate goal of helping businesses to make crucial decisions."

In a traditional course, I used to select a textbook, and assessments were designed to align with the textbook materials. In the Flex model, assessment design is completely centered around competencies. Assessments are designed to measure students’ performance on competencies. As faculty we were all striving to create assessments that are authentic in the sense that they measure students’ performance in a practical scenario—a scenario they are more likely to encounter in a work setting.

Read more »

Designing for Self-Directed, Self-Paced Learners

By Eileen Horn
February 24, 2017

February 24, 2017

BLE 200 Homepage
Homepage sample illustrating the standardized layout and support resources that contribute to student success.

At CEOEL, we are starting to work on developing a new degree for UW System’s Flexible Option. Before embarking on this new journey, I wanted to take some time to reflect on the last one. I had the opportunity to work with a great group of faculty and instructional designers this past year while developing UW–Extension’s first degree, a Bachelor of Science in Business Administration (BSBA). In this post, I’ll highlight just a few ways that this degree incorporates research-based recommendations for designing and delivering learning experiences to self-directed, self-paced learners. These practices address factors such as learner characteristics, assessment methods, and presentation of materials.

Read more »

« Previous Page
Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Quick Links

  • UW Flexible Option
  • UW Online Collaboratives Program Catalog

Online Courses

  • Independent Learning

Footer

Quick Links

  • UW Flexible Option
  • UW Online Collaboratives Program Catalog

Online Courses

  • Independent Learning

Contact Us

Office of Online & Professional Learning Resources
Universities of Wisconsin
780 Regent St., Suite 130
Madison, WI 53715

Phone: 608-800-6762

Fax: 608-265-9396

Copyright © 2025 by Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. All rights reserved.· Privacy Policy · Sitemap · Log in